Skip to main content

​
Why this matters

When you write a trading idea, you rarely specify everything. That’s normal. Trinigence is designed to:
  • remove unnecessary friction
  • avoid invalid or ambiguous strategies
  • keep you focused on logic, not boilerplate
This page explains what ATI fills automatically, and when it won’t.
Nothing is silently guessed in a way that changes strategy behavior without visibility.

​
What Trinigence fills automatically

​
1. Missing but required components

A strategy must be deterministic to be backtested. If your idea includes:
  • an entry but no exit
  • a direction but no risk rule
  • logic without a timeframe
ATI ensures the strategy is complete before running a backtest. Examples of what may be auto-filled:
  • default take profit and stop loss (clearly surfaced)
  • standard indicator parameters
  • execution assumptions required for backtesting

​
2. Standard indicator parameters

If you mention an indicator without parameters, ATI applies commonly accepted defaults. Examples:
  • RSI → RSI(14)
  • MACD → MACD(12, 26, 9)
  • EMA → context-aware defaults
All inferred parameters are visible and editable.

​
3. Trade direction assumptions

If direction is implied but not explicit: 
Trade pullbacks using RSI oversold levels.
ATI may infer long-only logic if phrasing suggests buying dips. If intent is unclear, ATI will ask before proceeding.

​
4. Exit symmetry

When exits are defined for one direction but not the other, ATI may:
  • mirror exits for both long and short
  • or ask whether exits should differ
Example: 
Go long when EMA(20) crosses above EMA(50).
Use a 6% take profit and 1% stop loss.
ATI assumes exits apply to all directions unless specified otherwise.

​
5. Backtest boundaries

If you don’t specify:
  • backtest start date
  • trading sessions or days
ATI applies:
  • the maximum available historical range
  • default trade-anytime behavior
These assumptions are surfaced in backtest results.

​
What Trinigence does NOT auto-fill

Some things are too important to guess. ATI will always ask for clarification if:
  • no exit is defined at all
  • risk is unbounded
  • logic is contradictory
  • language is non-deterministic
Examples ATI will not guess:
  • “exit when it feels overextended”
  • “trade during high volatility”
  • “enter on strong trend”

​
Assumptions vs clarifications

Assumptions

Safe defaults applied when industry standards exist and behavior is predictable.

Clarifications

Follow-up questions asked when behavior would materially change based on interpretation.
Yes. Every inferred value can be modified through iteration.
If a choice affects trade outcomes in a meaningful way, ATI asks instead of guessing.

​
Practical examples

​
Minimal idea

Trade ETH using RSI oversold conditions.
ATI fills:
  • timeframe
  • RSI parameters
  • long direction
  • default exits
  • backtest range

​
Partial structure

Trade BTC on 1h.
Go long when MACD crosses up.
ATI fills:
  • MACD parameters
  • exits
  • risk limits

​
Best practices

  • Let ATI fill boilerplate on the first pass
  • Review inferred details before judging results
  • Make assumptions explicit only when needed
  • Iterate instead of rewriting everything

Natural language vs structured input

Learn when to stay natural and when to be explicit.

Common missing details

The most frequent gaps in trading ideas.

How to write a trading idea

Learn how to express intent clearly.

Strategy structure overview

See how filled details map to strategy components.

FAQ & troubleshooting

Answers to common questions about AI assumptions.
ATI removes friction - not responsibility. You stay in control of strategy behavior.